AC

Social Media Account Stolen: TCK Article 243-245 + Compensation Case

TL;DR

Hesap çalıntısı = TCK m.243 (hesap erişimi) + TCK m.245 (kart/şifre kötüye kullanım) + 158/1-f (varsa dolandırıcılık).

15 Şubat 2026 Bilişim Suçları 3 dk okuma 9 görüntülenme Son güncelleme: 9 Mayıs 2026

Social media account theft is not a crime on its own; Combination of TCK art.243 + 245 and 158/1-f, if any. The first step is in-platform rollback; then prosecutor's complaint + compensation.

Platform refund processes

PlatformDurationContact
Instagram24-72hAccount recovery + selfie video
Facebook3-14gFull authentication
X / Twitter3-7gWith admin approval
TikTok2-5gSelfie + ID
LinkedIn5-10gID + selfie for blue tick
YouTube1-7gGoogle account recovery

Complaint from the prosecutor's office

  • TCK article 243: Unauthorized entry into the information system.
  • TCK article 245: Bank/credit card abuse (if there is a registered card).
  • TCK Article 158/1-f: If fraud has been committed against followers through the account.
  • TCK article 244: Changing account content (system disruption).

Compensation case

  • Financial: Loss of product/subscriber income received through the account (loss of blue ticks, loss of sponsorship).
  • Moral: Damage to reputation.
  • Defendant: If the perpetrator has been identified; If not identified, the platform as a "third party".

What does the prosecutor's office do if the name and surname cannot be determined?

Receives IP logs from the platform with CMK m.134; Country source determination with MLAT. Long processes for IPs outside Türkiye.

2FA was active, they stole it — is the platform responsible?

2FA bypass usually occurs via SIM swap (phone transfer). Operator (Türk Telekom, Vodafone, Turkcell) liability — operator KYC deficiency negligence. A separate lawsuit may be filed.

They defrauded followers through the account — am I responsible?

No, you are a victim. However, if your followers demand compensation from you, the "account theft verified by the platform" report is critical evidence.

There were posts that damaged my reputation — what should I do?

5651 m.9 access block + complaint to Twitter/Instagram + lawsuit for non-pecuniary damages. Deleting shares + archive control when the account is retrieved.

Is it the platform or me that is negligent?

Common flaw theory: Password difficulty, 2FA active, e-mail security is on you; Phishing protection by the platform, account recovery protocols by the platform.

Relevant legislation

  • TCK art.243 — Entering the information system (1-3 years + criminal money).
  • TCK Article 244 — Preventing/disrupting system operation (1-5 years).
  • TCK art.245 — Bank/credit card fraud (3-6 years).
  • TCK art.158/1-f — Qualified fraud when the information system/bank/credit institution is the tool (3-10 years).
  • CMK article 134 — Computer search, copying, seizure.
Legal notice: This article is for general information purposes; A meeting with a lawyer is required for a concrete case. Durations, rates and application are shaped by jurisprudence; Check the current legislation before applying.

Kaynaklar ve referanslar

Kaynaklar

Sosyal Medya Hesap Çalıntısı: TCK m.243-245 + Tazminat Davası içeriği hazırlanırken resmi mevzuat ve yüksek yargı kaynakları esas alınmıştır.

Telif bildirimi This content and all related Q&A texts are protected under Turkish Copyright Law No. 5846. Unauthorized copying, reproduction, publication, adaptation, bulk extraction, or commercial use is prohibited; legal and criminal remedies are reserved in case of infringement.

Hukuki destek arıyorsanız

Bu konuda profesyonel hukuki destek için Aycan Ceylan Avukatlık Bürosu olarak yanınızdayız.

Görüşme Planla